GLM-4: Complete Specifications, Pricing, API Access & Use Cases (2026)
What Is GLM-4?
GLM-4 is Zhipu AI’s GLM-family large language model series, made available through the GLM-4 API on January 16, 2024. It features 128K-token context support in key GLM-4 variants and text-focused capabilities such as instruction following, reasoning, long-context processing, streaming, function calling, and structured output, with provider pricing listed in CNY per million tokens as of June 2026.
In current BigModel documentation, GLM-4 is a model family rather than one single API model ID. The GLM-4 page lists five variants:
- GLM-4-Plus
- GLM-4-Air-250414
- GLM-4-AirX
- GLM-4-FlashX-250414
- GLM-4-Flash-250414
Users usually search for GLM-4 to compare context length, pricing, API access, long-document handling, Chinese-English capability, and alternatives such as DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen2.5-72B Instruct.
GLM-4 should not be treated as Zhipu AI’s newest model generation. BigModel’s current model overview places newer GLM-5, GLM-5.1, GLM-5.2, GLM-4.7, GLM-4.6, and GLM-4.5 models above legacy GLM-4 variants. This page therefore focuses on GLM-4 as a documented production model family, not as the latest Zhipu flagship.
What Are GLM-4’s Key Specifications and Pricing?
| Field | Verified Value |
|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI / BigModel, as of June 2026 |
| Model Family | GLM-4 family |
| Model Type | Text-focused large language model family |
| Release Date | GLM-4 API availability began January 16, 2024, as of June 2026 |
| Current GLM-4 Variants | GLM-4-Plus, GLM-4-Air-250414, GLM-4-AirX, GLM-4-FlashX-250414, GLM-4-Flash-250414 |
| Context Window | 128K for GLM-4-Plus, GLM-4-Air-250414, GLM-4-FlashX-250414, and GLM-4-Flash-250414; 8K for GLM-4-AirX, as of June 2026 |
| Maximum Output | 4K for GLM-4-Plus and GLM-4-AirX; other variant output limits should be checked on the current BigModel page |
| Input Pricing | Not separately specified as input-only pricing on the checked GLM-4 page; variant-level token prices are listed, as of June 2026 |
| Output Pricing | Not separately specified as output-only pricing on the checked GLM-4 page; variant-level token prices are listed, as of June 2026 |
| Variant Pricing | GLM-4-Plus: ¥5 / million tokens; GLM-4-Air-250414: ¥0.5 / million tokens; GLM-4-AirX: ¥10 / million tokens; GLM-4-FlashX-250414: ¥0.1 / million tokens; GLM-4-Flash-250414: free model page price shown as "/", as of June 2026 |
| Cached Input Pricing | Not confirmed from official sources as of June 2026 |
| Pricing Unit | CNY per million tokens on the GLM-4 model page, as of June 2026 |
| Modality Support | Text input and text output for listed GLM-4 language variants, as of June 2026 |
| API Access | BigModel chat completions API and Zhipu / Z.ai SDK examples are documented, as of June 2026 |
| API Endpoint | /api/paas/v4/chat/completions |
| Example Model ID | glm-4-plus |
| Authentication | Bearer-token authentication |
| Rate Limits | Concurrent request limits are documented by user tier and variant; exact production limits depend on account tier, as of June 2026 |
| Fine-Tuning Support | Not confirmed for these hosted GLM-4 variants from the checked GLM-4 model page as of June 2026 |
| Streaming Support | Supported, as of June 2026 |
| Tool / Function Calling | Supported, as of June 2026 |
| Structured Output / JSON Mode | Structured JSON-style output is supported, as of June 2026 |
| License / Usage Restrictions | Not specified in the checked GLM-4 model page as of June 2026 |
What Can GLM-4 Do That Makes It Useful in Production?
GLM-4 is useful for long-context text workflows when teams choose a 128K variant. This can support document summarization, contract review preparation, policy extraction, knowledge-base answers, and retrieval-augmented generation. The limitation is that long context does not remove the need for source grounding, chunking strategy, and output verification.
GLM-4 can support structured application workflows because the documentation lists streaming, function calling, context caching, structured output, and MCP-style external tool or data-source access. These features matter for customer support routing, field extraction, workflow agents, and backends that need JSON-like outputs. Production teams should still validate schemas and create fallback handling.
GLM-4 is relevant for Chinese-English and multilingual text processing. BigModel’s GLM-4 page describes translation and multilingual mixed-text handling as recommended scenarios, and it states that GLM-4-Flash-250414 supports up to 26 languages.
Teams evaluating bilingual assistants may compare GLM-4 with DeepSeek-R1 for reasoning-heavy use cases and Claude 3.5 Sonnet for instruction-following workflows.
What Are GLM-4’s Supported Modalities?
| Modality | Supported? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | Yes | Listed for the checked GLM-4 language variants |
| Text output | Yes | Listed for the checked GLM-4 language variants |
| Image input | Not confirmed for checked GLM-4 language variants | BigModel lists separate vision-capable model categories |
| Audio input | Not confirmed | No GLM-4-specific audio input support is confirmed in the checked documentation |
| Video input | Not confirmed | BigModel lists separate video-capable model categories |
| Streaming | Yes | Streaming is documented for BigModel chat completion workflows |
| Function calling | Yes | Function calling is documented |
| Structured text output | Yes | JSON-style structured output is documented |
| Context caching | Yes | Context caching is documented |
| MCP / external tool access | Yes | Documentation references external tool or data-source access |
Where Does GLM-4 Fall Short?
GLM-4’s main documentation issue is naming clarity. "GLM-4" refers to a family, while production use requires a specific variant and model ID, such as glm-4-plus.
Pricing comparison also requires care. The checked GLM-4 page lists variant-level token prices but does not clearly split input and output prices. This makes direct cost comparisons with models such as GPT-4o mini or Mistral Large less straightforward unless teams normalize billing assumptions.
GLM-4 language variants are text-focused in the checked documentation. Teams needing native image, audio, or video understanding should evaluate dedicated multimodal models instead of assuming GLM-4 itself supports those modalities.
This is a general AI limitation and is not model-specific unless stated by the provider: GLM-4 can hallucinate, misunderstand ambiguous prompts, or produce plausible but incorrect output. Legal, medical, financial, security, and safety-critical workflows require expert review and independent verification.
What Is GLM-4 Best Used For?
| Use Case | Why GLM-4 May Fit | Important Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Long-document analysis | 128K variants support larger prompt and document contexts | Long context still needs retrieval design and validation |
| Chinese-English assistants | GLM-4 is a China-developed text model family with documented translation and multilingual scenarios | Domain-specific terminology needs testing |
| Structured extraction | JSON-style output and function calling are documented | Outputs require schema validation |
| Low-latency or high-concurrency text apps | FlashX and AirX variants are positioned for speed or concurrency | Exact latency depends on workload, account tier, and deployment conditions |
| Workflow automation | Streaming, tools, and structured output can support application backends | Agent workflows require monitoring, guardrails, and retry logic |
How Does GLM-4 Compare to DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen2.5-72B Instruct?
| Comparison Area | GLM-4 | DeepSeek-V3 | Qwen2.5-72B Instruct | Scenario Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI / BigModel | DeepSeek | Qwen / Alibaba ecosystem | Provider choice often depends on API access, hosting, compliance, and ecosystem |
| Access Pattern | BigModel hosted API | DeepSeek API or third-party gateways, depending on deployment | Open-weight and hosted options depending on provider | GLM-4 fits BigModel API workflows; Qwen may fit open-weight deployment |
| Context | 128K on key variants; 8K on GLM-4-AirX | Must be checked against the current DeepSeek model version | Commonly evaluated as a long-context open-weight instruction model, but deployment details depend on serving stack | Long-document tasks should compare usable context, output limits, and retrieval design |
| Modality | Text input and text output for checked GLM-4 language variants | Primarily text for core chat models unless otherwise specified | Text-focused instruction model | Use dedicated multimodal models when image, audio, or video are required |
| Cost Comparison | CNY per million tokens by GLM-4 variant; no clear input/output split on the checked page | Must be checked against current DeepSeek pricing | Cost depends on hosting provider or self-hosting infrastructure | Cost-sensitive teams should normalize input, output, cache, batch, and hosting costs |
| Best Fit | Chinese-English text workflows, BigModel API users, structured application workflows | DeepSeek ecosystem users and teams comparing high-capability text models | Teams that prefer open-weight deployment and infrastructure control | Choose based on access route, governance needs, latency, and cost model |
How Do I Access GLM-4?
Developers can access GLM-4 variants through Zhipu AI’s BigModel API. The official GLM-4 documentation provides chat completion examples using the endpoint /api/paas/v4/chat/completions, Bearer-token authentication, and the model ID glm-4-plus in examples.
Python Example
import osfrom zai import ZhipuAiClientclient = ZhipuAiClient(api_key=os.environ["ZHIPUAI_API_KEY"])response = client.chat.completions.create(model="glm-4-plus",messages=[{"role": "system", "content": "You are a concise technical assistant."},{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize GLM-4 in three bullet points."}],max_tokens=1024,temperature=0.7)print(response.choices[0].message.content)
curl Example
curl -X POST "https://open.bigmodel.cn/api/paas/v4/chat/completions" \-H "Authorization: Bearer $ZHIPUAI_API_KEY" \-H "Content-Type: application/json" \-d '{"model": "glm-4-plus","messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a concise technical assistant."},{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize GLM-4 in three bullet points."}],"max_tokens": 1024,"temperature": 0.7}'
Production applications should choose the exact GLM-4 variant required by the workload. GLM-4-Plus, Air, AirX, FlashX, and Flash variants differ in context length, maximum output, speed positioning, concurrency, and price.
FAQs
What is GLM-4’s context window?
As of June 2026, BigModel lists 128K context for GLM-4-Plus, GLM-4-Air-250414, GLM-4-FlashX-250414, and GLM-4-Flash-250414. GLM-4-AirX is listed with an 8K context window.
How much does GLM-4 cost?
The checked GLM-4 page lists variant-level prices in CNY per million tokens: ¥5 for GLM-4-Plus, ¥0.5 for GLM-4-Air-250414, ¥10 for GLM-4-AirX, and ¥0.1 for GLM-4-FlashX-250414.
How do developers access GLM-4?
Developers can access GLM-4 through Zhipu AI’s BigModel API. Official examples use Bearer-token authentication, the chat completions endpoint, and model IDs such as glm-4-plus.
Is GLM-4 better than DeepSeek-V3 or Qwen2.5-72B?
There is no universal winner. GLM-4 may fit BigModel API and Chinese-English text workflows, DeepSeek-V3 may fit DeepSeek API users, and Qwen2.5-72B may fit teams that prefer open-weight deployment.


